Residents ask us 'Why is the living room so cold?' A systems approach to mapping retrofit decision-making among non-profit housing stakeholders in British Columbia and Saskatchewan, Canada

Retrofit and repair of social and affordable housing can improve living conditions and reduce residential Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. Increasingly in Canada, policies and programs aim to improve the condition and energy-efficiency of these aging buildings which have substantial deferred maintenance. This can mitigate the effects of climate change while preserving affordable housing for the growing number of Canadians in housing need – both critical for transforming unsustainable housing systems. However, policy and program effectiveness are constrained by complex and fragmented urban social housing systems, including overlapping jurisdictions and diversity of actors, policies, regional climates and energy sources.<BR><BR> Within this context, non-profit housing providers make daily asset management and maintenance decisions to best provide safe, affordable, and accessible housing now and in the future – decisions which may lead to major energy efficiency retrofits. However, retrofit decision-making is a process of negotiation between actors and materials evolving over several stages. To design more integrated and transformative policies, we must understand system elements currently shaping retrofit decision-making processes among these key system actors. Using a survey of non-profit housing stakeholders in contrasting Canadian community housing systems in British Columbia and Saskatchewan, followed by focus groups among Saskatchewan stakeholders, 16 influencing factors are identified and mapped to four early stages of retrofit decision-making, creating a process systems map. Factors vary in influence across stages; however, three – building issues, funding availability, and impact on residents – appear to drive the process. Through document analysis and interviews, influence of local system characteristics in each jurisdiction are then explored, informing policy and program recommendations.

Author dc:creator

• Humble, Robbi

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Das, Runa

• College of interdisciplinary studies

Language dc:language.iso

en_US

Identifier URI

https://doi.org/10.25316/ir-19887

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:null:10613/28282