Architectural discourse and practice at the end of the twenthieth century (Gilles Delueze)

A flaw in the use of difference in the semiotic basis of deconstruction is exposed. The finer grained, flexible notion of difference described by Gilles Delueze is inserted in its place. Freed from illustrating difference as a goal, deconstruction becomes a flexible method of analysis that can inform a wide range of architectural solutions. Reinterpreting deconstruction focuses attention on extant architectural discourse.

Name thesis:degree_name

Master of Architecture

Level thesis:degree_level

Masters

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Architecture

Grantor

Rice University

Year dc:date.issued

1996

Author dc:creator

• Juros, Matthew E.

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Pope, Albert

• Architecture

Statement dc:rights

• Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise indicated. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the work beyond the bounds of fair use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.

Language dc:language.iso

eng

Handle dc:identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/1911/14023

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:repository.rice.edu:1911/14023