Abstract
dc:description.abstractThe Prioress's contrasting depictions in the "General Prologue" and "The Prioress's Tale" maintain a reputation for ambiguity and poetic irony. Historical evidence and a closer reading of Chaucer's text suggest that critical analyses of the Prioress's portrait and tale have neglected to consider the role of Chaucer the pilgrim and his representation of Madame Eglentyne. Exploring the narrator's role in painting Madame Eglentyne provides the audience with a greater comprehension of the Prioress and her spiritual circumstance.
Degree
thesis:*- Grantor dc:publisher
- University of Oregon
- Year dc:date.issued
- 1993
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Stover, Stephanie Leigh
- Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
-
- Bishop, Louise M.
Subjects
dc:subject × 3Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US
- UO theses and dissertations are provided for research and educational purposes and may be under copyright by the author or the author’s heirs. Please contact scholars@uoregon.edu with any questions or comments. In your email, be sure to include the URL and title of the specific items that you are inquiring about.
- Language dc:language.iso
- en_US
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Handle dc:identifier.uri
- https://hdl.handle.net/1794/31836