Back to search

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Uncertainty quantification in safety codes using a Bayesian approach with data from separate and integral effect tests

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Uncertainty quantification in thermal-hydraulic safety codes is a very challenging and computationally expensive endeavor. Methods are therefore needed to reduce that computational burden, while still providing a reasonable estimate for uncertainty. To do so, a Quantitative Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (QPIRT) is implemented to screen down to key parameters that influence a figure of merit. From there, a surrogate model is built to approximate the complex input-output relationship of the safety code. The surrogate model type chosen is that of a probabilistic response surface following the Gaussian Process (GP) model framework. A GP prior is placed on the input/output functional relationship, which ultimately leads to a Bayesian non-parametric non-linear model of the safety code. The surrogate emulates the behavior of the long running computer code and thanks to the GP, provides a simple estimate to the additional uncertainty in making a prediction. In addition, for emulating multiple outputs together, which is difficult to do with standard GP models, Gaussian Process Factor Analysis (GPFA) models also known as Function Factorization with Gaussian Process Priors (FFGP) models were applied. The FFGP models are far more complicated than the standard GP model and so various simplifying approximations were made to enable fast yet accurate emulation of the safety code. All together a suite of surrogate models with varying levels of complexity and thus flexibility were developed for emulating the complex response from a safety code. These very computationally cheap surrogates are then used to propagate the uncertainty in the key parameters onto the FOM. Information from previous Separate and Integral Effect Tests is then used to calibrate those key parameter distributions with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). This allows the ultimate uncertainty of the figure of merit to be found conditioned on the knowledge gained from those past experiments.

Degree

thesis:*
Department dc:contributor.department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering.
Grantor dc:publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Year dc:date.issued
2014

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Yurko, Joseph Paul
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Jacopo Buongiorno.

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92095
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/92095

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
MIT
Base URL
dspace.mit.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Yurko, Joseph Paul. Uncertainty quantification in safety codes using a Bayesian approach with data from separate and integral effect tests. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92095