Back to search

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Evaluation of different forms of compression in digital hearing aids

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

People with cochlear hearing loss have a reduced dynamic range of hearing, thus amplitude compression may provide adequate amplification of soft sounds without uncomfortable over-amplification of loud sounds caused by conventional linear amplification. Although compression is conceptually straightforward, there are various design parameters that may affect the intelligibility of speech, the quality of sounds, and the perception of background noise. Four combinations of the Dual Front-End automatic gain control (AGC) system were implemented: (1) The Dual Front-End with a Hold Timer developed in Stone et al. [8], which aimed at reducing pumping effects while maintaining a relatively fast release; (2) The Dual Front-End with the SNR Estimator, investigated by Martin et al. [4], designed to provide a varying release time constant depending on the SNR level; (3) The Dual Front-End with both the Hold Timer and the SNR Estimator; (4) The Dual Front-End by itself, without the Hold Timer or the SNR Estimator. A fifth system, composed of linear amplification and compression limiting, was implemented to be used as a reference condition. A variety of stimuli consisting of speech at different levels and speech plus environmental sounds were processed by the five systems and presented over headphones to three hearing-impaired subjects. Subjects rated the processed stimuli for intelligibility and quality. While no clear differences were found among the four compression systems, there were some major differences between the Dual Front-End systems and the Linear system. The direction of these differences varied with subject, and to a lesser degree, with stimulus condition. In addition, compression systems generally performed better in stimuli conditions with low SNRs, indicating that compression may be useful for suppression of background noise.

Degree

thesis:*
Department dc:contributor.department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
Grantor dc:publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Year dc:date.issued
2001

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Aguayo, Ivan, 1978-
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Julie Greenberg.

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8941
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/8941

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
MIT
Base URL
dspace.mit.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Aguayo, Ivan, 1978-. Evaluation of different forms of compression in digital hearing aids. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8941