Globalization and standards : the liberalization of trade and the potential for a regulatory race to the top

Globalization is changing the way in which the world is organized. The world trade regime is increasingly the dominant mode of organizing international relations. Within this context of globalization and liberalization of trade, empirical examples of a race to the bottom co-exist with examples of a race to the top and examples of stable heterogeneity of international standards. The puzzle, then, is to determine the structural conditions, sources of power, and policy instruments that determine whether international standards will diverge or converge, upward or downward. This research seeks to reveal the potential for (and limitations of) a race to the top in international standards. System dynamics modeling and theories of globalization and regulatory competition are applied to three case studies to explore the causes of a race to the top: the Montreal Protocol on Ozone Depleting Substances, dolphin-safe tuna, and fair trade coffee. Many of the concerns of a race to the bottom pertain to process and production methods (PPMs) in global supply chains. One of the themes in this research is the distinction between standards based on the characteristics of a product and standards based on the process and production methods (PPMs) used to produce the product. Whereas product standards can be monitored and enforced at the point of market access, PPM standards must be monitored and enforced at the site of production, which can be problematic in global supply chains. This research seeks to elucidate the sources of power and policy levers available to promote higher PPM standards within the context of globalization and the liberalization of trade.

Department dc:contributor.department

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program.

Grantor dc:publisher

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Year dc:date.issued

2007

Author dc:creator

• Cameron, Diane (Melissa Jessica Diane)

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Richard Locke and John Sterman.

• Technology and Policy Program.

Statement dc:rights

• M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.

Licence dc:rights.uri

• http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582

Language dc:language.iso

eng

Handle dc:identifier.uri

http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/41764

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/41764