Back to search

Durham University

Can we be Civil? What Activists and Policymakers Tell Us about Human Rights and World Society

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This study looks at the seeming intractability and predictability within the human rights debate between policy makers and activists and puts it under the lens to see what it tells us about these sets of actors and what their deliberation in turn tells us about international and world society. It does this by identifying some underlying fissures in this debate that require a closer examination. These features are moral agency, the relationship between order and justice, and the basis of human rights, they each represent different facets of underlying tensions between the two sets of actors of interest, which are predicted to take the form of a family tree of ideas between the two groups. The goal is to better understand the structure underlying this debate and develop analytical tools which can be used for this debate and used for the analysis of broader debates on similar questions in world society.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
PhD
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
doctoral
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
Durham University
Year dc:date.issued
2009

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Gilligan, Daniel

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Durham University
Base URL
etheses.dur.ac.uk/cgi/oai2
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Gilligan, Daniel. Can we be Civil? What Activists and Policymakers Tell Us about Human Rights and World Society. doctoral thesis, Durham University, 2009.