Back to search

Duquesne

Bergson's Aristotelian Theory of Duration and the History of Temporality

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

In Being and Time, Heidegger claims that the history of the ordinary concept of time is Aristotelian. He says further that this Aristotelian heritage runs from Aristotle to Bergson. In this dissertation, I dispute part of this claim. I dispute that the history of the concept of time is Aristotelian, but I agree that there is a connection between Aristotle and Bergson. Bergson, whose writing on temporality was popular just before the publication of Being and Time, has a theory of temporality, which he calls duration, which is heavily influenced by Aristotle's theory. The primary figure that influences the history of the concept of time, though, is Augustine. This is because Aristotle's theory of time is a qualitative theory of time, whereas Augustine's theory is quantitative (which Bergson calls spatial), and the history of the concept of time is primarily, and for the most part, quantitative or spatial. Heidegger's insistence on calling the history of the concept Aristotelian, and on drawing the genealogy from Aristotle to Bergson, leads me to believe that Heidegger's own theory of original temporality is actually, in part, a reaction to Bergson's theory of duration.</p><p> In this dissertation, I demonstrate this claim in the following manner. In Chapter 1, I examine Augustine's theory of time, and show how it, rather than Aristotle, lies at the heart of the two major modern theories of time: Kant's theory and the theory that runs through classical mechanics. Then, in Chapter 2, I show that Aristotle's theory of time is better understood as a qualitative theory. This leads to Chapter 3, where I show that Bergson's theory of duration, which is a purely qualitative theory of time, was influenced by Aristotle's theory. Finally, in Chapter 4, I show that Heidegger's theory of original temporality is actually a spatial theory of the sort Bergson critiqued. The genealogy Heidegger draws from Aristotle to Bergson seems designed to hide the fact that Heidegger's theory arose, in part, as a reaction to Bergson's theory of duration.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
PhD
Level thesis:degree_level
Immediate Access
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Philosophy
Year dc:date.available
2005

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Collins-Cavanaugh, Daniel
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Thomas Rockmore
  • Daniel Selcer
  • Ronald Polanksy

Subjects

dc:subject × 6

Rights

Language dc:language
English

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/426
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:dsc.duq.edu:etd-1439

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Duquesne
Base URL
dsc.duq.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Collins-Cavanaugh, Daniel. Bergson's Aristotelian Theory of Duration and the History of Temporality. Immediate Access thesis, 2005. https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/426