Back to search

Shipping Law Unit

Do the provisions of section 3(7)(a)(ii) read with section 3(7)(b)(i) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act 105 of 1983 infringe the substantive requirements of section 25(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996?

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

In this dissertation, the issue that is considered is whether or not the provisions of section 3(7)(a)(ii) read with section 3(7)(b)(i) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act 105 of 1983 ('the Act') constitute an arbitrary deprivation of a minority shareholder's property because they permit the deprivation of minority shareholder's property interests purely on the basis of common control by the majority shareholder.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
Shipping Law Unit
Year dc:date.issued
2015

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Doble, Vanessa
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Bradfield, Graham

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15160
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/15160

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Cape Town
Base URL
open.uct.ac.za/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Doble, Vanessa. Do the provisions of section 3(7)(a)(ii) read with section 3(7)(b)(i) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act 105 of 1983 infringe the substantive requirements of section 25(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996?. Shipping Law Unit, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15160