Back to search

University of Birmingham

Defining and refining inerrancy: revisiting the doctrine for the 21st century

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This dissertation revisits the doctrine of inerrancy. It recognises that a new phase is being added to the inerrancy debate’s already lengthy history, but at a time where a number of those seeking to contribute appear unaware of the fundamental issue, as to what inerrancy really means. Therefore, the dissertation focuses on that key issue, and defines inerrancy for the new phase of debate. To do so, it looks back to the previous phase of debate between 1978 and 1987 - drawing upon the strong scholarly work of that era – re-establishing a solid definition of inerrancy. This is attained by identifying, in part 1, that the appropriate method for reaching a definition is the retroductive method, a method which is applied to Scripture’s teaching in parts 2 and 3 to propose a clear definition of inerrancy in the preliminary conclusion. In part 4, the writings of two contemporary theologians are analysed to see if the now re-established 20th century doctrine of inerrancy can be developed into a 21st century model. The goal is eventually achieved by applying Vanhoozer’s model of ‘dramatic doctrine’ to inerrancy, giving a fresh refinement to the definition and bringing a new contribution to the debate.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
m_ph
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
m_ph
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Birmingham
Year dc:date.issued
2009

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Churchouse, Matthew John

Subjects

dc:subject × 4

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Birmingham
Base URL
etheses.bham.ac.uk/cgi/oai2
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Churchouse, Matthew John. Defining and refining inerrancy: revisiting the doctrine for the 21st century. m_ph thesis, University of Birmingham, 2009.