Abstract
dc:description.abstractByron has long been labeled a digressive poet, a designation that has been accepted by most structural, psychological, and linguistic critics without much argument. This thesis takes issue with this assessment on the grounds that in his plays, Byron's lengthy speeches always serve specific purposes. Focusing on Byron's Marino Faliero, this thesis will examine the structural function of the speeches in providing the play with unity; the psychological purpose of those speeches in establishing Faliero's identity; and the linguistic difficulties that become apparent in Faliero's search for identity through speech. The analysis will draw from the work of major Byron critics as well as psychoanalysts and linguists. The thesis concludes that Byron seems unique for Romantics in both his heightened awareness of linguistic and psychological problems, as well as in his approach to them. This awareness makes Byron an anachronistic figure whose aesthetic seems more modern or even post-modern than Romantic.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- M.A.
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Masters
- Grantor
- Baylor University.
- Year dc:date.issued
- 1994
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Peckham, Joel, Jr. (Joel Bishop)
- Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
-
- Goode, Clement Tyson, 1929-
Subjects
dc:subject × 2Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.
- Language dc:language.iso
- en
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Handle dc:identifier.uri
- https://hdl.handle.net/2104/14972