Considering the evidence : what counts as the best evidence for the post harvest management of split thickness skin graft donor sites?

Wiechula, Richard John

Back to search

University of Adelaide

Considering the evidence : what counts as the best evidence for the post harvest management of split thickness skin graft donor sites?

dc:creator Wiechula, Richard John

dc:date.issued2004

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*

Author dc:creator: Wiechula, Richard John

Rights

Language dc:language.iso: en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*

Handle dc:identifier.uri: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/38207
OAI identifier oai:identifier: oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/38207

Chain of custody

source

Harvested from: University of Adelaide
Base URL: digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/server/oai/request
Last updated: 2026-07-24
Source record: OAI-PMH GetRecord

related terms

adelaide
2004

citation

Wiechula, Richard John. Considering the evidence : what counts as the best evidence for the post harvest management of split thickness skin graft donor sites?. 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/2440/38207

Considering the evidence : what counts as the best evidence for the post harvest management of split thickness skin graft donor sites?

Author and committee

Rights

Identifiers

Chain of custody

More from University of Adelaide